Back to HomeBack to Blog

SEO vs GEO: getting found by Google… and by ChatGPT

2026-08-27

SEO vs GEO: getting found by Google… and by ChatGPT

Your site is clean, your Google ranking is decent… and yet ChatGPT, Perplexity or Gemini never mention you? That's expected: it's a different game.

SEO: getting ranked

SEO (Search Engine Optimization) is about a position in a list of results. The levers haven't changed:

Goal: the click.

GEO: getting cited

GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) targets something else: having your content used inside the answer of a generative engine. There is no page 1 here. There is one answer, and the 2 or 3 sources it cites.

What matters:

Goal: the mention.

What actually changes

| | SEO | GEO | |---|---|---| | Target | Googlebot | LLMs + AI crawlers | | Outcome | a ranked link | a citation in the answer | | Winning content | long, keyword-rich | short, factual, structured | | Key signal | backlinks | clarity + consistency |

The mistakes I see most often

  1. A fully client-side rendered site: the crawler gets an empty page
  2. Blocking GPTBot or ClaudeBot in robots.txt "for safety"
  3. Pages with no clear answer: lots of storytelling, zero facts
  4. No FAQ, no schema.org

Do you have to choose?

No. SEO is still the foundation: without an indexable, fast, well-structured site, GEO doesn't work. GEO is an extra layer: writing so an AI can understand you, summarize you and cite you without getting it wrong.

In 2026 the right question is no longer "am I on page 1?" but "if someone asks ChatGPT for a freelance mobile developer, am I part of the answer?".

👉 Want a quick SEO + GEO audit of your site? Let's look at it together in a 30-min call.

Related Links